Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether liquidation of the corporate debtor was warranted on the rejection of all resolution plans by the sole Committee of Creditors, and whether the resolution professional could be appointed as liquidator with directions to first explore sale of the corporate debtor as a going concern.
Analysis: The sole member of the Committee of Creditors had rejected all the resolution plans and resolved to liquidate the corporate debtor. The record also showed that the resolution process had been sufficiently explored, that the resolution professional had given consent to act as liquidator, and that the Committee of Creditors had resolved on contribution towards liquidation costs and on exploring a going concern sale in liquidation. In these circumstances, the statutory conditions for liquidation under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 were satisfied. The moratorium consequently had to cease, and the liquidator was required to carry out liquidation in accordance with the Code and the Liquidation Process Regulations, including the option to first attempt sale of the corporate debtor as a going concern.
Conclusion: Liquidation was ordered, the resolution professional was appointed as liquidator, the moratorium ceased, and the liquidator was directed to proceed in accordance with the statutory liquidation framework, including first exploring a going concern sale.