Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2022 (7) TMI 385 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal confirms CIT(A) decisions on disallowances, transfer pricing, subsidies, and deductions. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decisions on various issues including disallowances under Section 14A, transfer pricing adjustments, treatment of ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal confirms CIT(A) decisions on disallowances, transfer pricing, subsidies, and deductions.

                          The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decisions on various issues including disallowances under Section 14A, transfer pricing adjustments, treatment of subsidies, and deductions for written-off deposits. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to previous rulings and judicial precedents, directing verification for certain deductions and setting aside some issues for reconsideration by the CIT(A). Overall, the appeals were partly allowed for statistical purposes, with favorable outcomes for the assessee on most issues.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D.
                          2. Disallowance under Section 14A under Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) computation.
                          3. Transfer pricing adjustment related to interest on shareholders' deposits.
                          4. Transfer pricing adjustment related to technical know-how fees.
                          5. Transfer pricing adjustment related to interest on outstanding balances with AE.
                          6. Nature of subsidy received under the Package Scheme of Incentives, 2007.
                          7. Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) on conversion of capital assets into stock-in-trade.
                          8. Deduction of provisions for inter-corporate deposits and advances written off.
                          9. Deduction of security deposit written off.
                          10. Transfer pricing adjustment on account of risk involved in giving corporate guarantee.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D:
                          The AO invoked Section 14A read with Rule 8D to disallow Rs.3,58,69,794/-, Rs.68,46,172/-, and Rs.27,97,935/- for A.Y. 2009-10, 2010-11, and 2013-14 respectively. The CIT(A) deleted these additions based on the fact that no exempt income was earned by the assessee during these years. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, emphasizing that no disallowance can be made under Section 14A read with Rule 8D if no exempt income is earned.

                          2. Disallowance under Section 14A under MAT computation:
                          The AO made disallowances under Section 14A read with Rule 8D in the MAT computation under Section 115JB. The CIT(A) deleted these disallowances, and the Tribunal upheld this decision, citing the Special Bench decision in ACIT vs. Vireet Investment Pvt. Ltd., which held that no disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D is sustainable under MAT computation if no exempt income is earned.

                          3. Transfer pricing adjustment related to interest on shareholders' deposits:
                          The AO made transfer pricing adjustments for interest on shareholders' deposits for A.Y. 2009-10, 2010-11, and 2013-14. The CIT(A) deleted these adjustments, following the Tribunal's decision in the assessee's own case for A.Y. 2012-13. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, noting that the RBI's permission and the decisions in CIT vs. Hukumchand Mills Ltd. and UCO Bank vs. CIT supported the assessee's position.

                          4. Transfer pricing adjustment related to technical know-how fees:
                          The AO proposed adjustments for technical know-how fees for A.Y. 2010-11 and 2013-14. The CIT(A) deleted these adjustments, following the Tribunal's decision in the assessee's own case for A.Y. 2012-13. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, referencing the Supreme Court's decision in Godhra Electricity Co. Ltd. vs. CIT, which supported the non-recognition of hypothetical income.

                          5. Transfer pricing adjustment related to interest on outstanding balances with AE:
                          The AO proposed adjustments for interest on outstanding balances with AE for A.Y. 2009-10, 2010-11, and 2013-14. The CIT(A) deleted these adjustments, following the Tribunal's decision in the assessee's own case for A.Y. 2012-13. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, noting that such balances do not fall within the ambit of international transactions.

                          6. Nature of subsidy received under the Package Scheme of Incentives, 2007:
                          The AO treated the subsidy received under the Package Scheme of Incentives, 2007 as revenue receipt, while the CIT(A) treated it as a capital receipt, following the Tribunal's decision in the assessee's own case for A.Y. 2011-12. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, referencing relevant Supreme Court and High Court decisions that supported treating the subsidy as a capital receipt.

                          7. Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) on conversion of capital assets into stock-in-trade:
                          The AO made an addition for LTCG on conversion of capital assets into stock-in-trade. The CIT(A) deleted this addition, following the Tribunal's decision in the assessee's own case for A.Y. 2012-13. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, directing the AO to verify the sale of stock-in-trade and tax the proportionate capital gains accordingly.

                          8. Deduction of provisions for inter-corporate deposits and advances written off:
                          The AO disallowed the deduction for provisions for inter-corporate deposits written off. The CIT(A) directed the AO to verify if the amounts were actually written off and allow the deduction if so. The Tribunal upheld this direction for verification.

                          9. Deduction of security deposit written off:
                          The AO disallowed the deduction for security deposits written off. The CIT(A) directed the AO to verify if the amounts were actually written off and allow the deduction if so. The Tribunal upheld this direction for verification.

                          10. Transfer pricing adjustment on account of risk involved in giving corporate guarantee:
                          The AO made adjustments for the risk involved in giving a corporate guarantee. The CIT(A) restricted the mark-up to 0.5%. The Tribunal, following its decision in the assessee's own case for A.Y. 2012-13, held that providing corporate guarantees for the overall benefit of the group should be treated at arm's length without any separate mark-up and does not fall under the definition of international transactions. The Tribunal deleted the adjustments.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decisions on most issues, emphasizing consistency with previous rulings and relevant judicial precedents. The Tribunal directed verification for certain deductions and set aside some issues for fresh consideration by the CIT(A). The appeals were partly allowed for statistical purposes.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found