Car dealer entitled to input tax credit on demo vehicle purchases under section 17(5)(a)(A)

The AAR, West Bengal held that a car dealer is entitled to input tax credit on demo vehicle purchases. The applicant purchased demo vehicles for test drives as mandated by the manufacturer, capitalizing them in books before eventual sale. The Authority ruled that despite capitalization and mandatory retention periods, demo vehicles are purchased for further supply, satisfying section 17(5)(a)(A) conditions. The business model involves keeping demo vehicles for specific periods before sale, which doesn't alter the purpose of further supply. Input tax credit on demo vehicle purchases can be set off against GST output tax liability.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Admissibility of input tax credit on purchases of demo vehicles.
2. Conditions and restrictions under Section 16 and Section 17(5) of the GST Act.
3. Applicability of advance rulings from other jurisdictions.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Admissibility of Input Tax Credit on Purchases of Demo Vehicles:
The applicant, an authorized dealer of Hyundai Motor India Limited, uses demo vehicles for providing trial runs to customers. These vehicles are capitalized in the books of accounts. The applicant sought an advance ruling on whether the input tax credit (ITC) on the purchase of demo vehicles can be utilized against GST liability on the sale of vehicles, spares, and labor.

2. Conditions and Restrictions under Section 16 and Section 17(5) of the GST Act:
Section 16(1) of the GST Act allows a registered person to take ITC on supply of inputs and capital goods used in the course or furtherance of business. However, Section 17(5)(a) restricts ITC on motor vehicles used for transportation of persons, except when used for further supply, transportation of passengers, or training on driving such vehicles.

The demo vehicles are used for demonstration purposes and subsequently sold. The applicant argued that these vehicles are essential for marketing and sales promotion, and thus, ITC should be available. The applicant cited several advance rulings from other jurisdictions supporting the claim that ITC on demo vehicles is allowable.

3. Applicability of Advance Rulings from Other Jurisdictions:
The applicant referenced advance rulings from Jharkhand, Maharashtra, and Kerala, which allowed ITC on demo vehicles under specific conditions. These rulings emphasized that demo vehicles, although capitalized, are ultimately supplied further, thus qualifying for ITC.

Observations & Findings:
The Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) examined the applicant's business model and the provisions of the GST Act. It was noted that demo vehicles are initially capitalized but are ultimately supplied, fulfilling the condition of "further supply" under Section 17(5)(a)(A). The AAR observed that the restriction on ITC for motor vehicles does not apply if the vehicles are used for further supply, even if they are capitalized and used for a specific period before being sold.

The AAR concluded that the applicant's practice of capitalizing demo vehicles does not preclude the availability of ITC, as the vehicles are eventually supplied. The time duration for which the vehicles are used as demo cars does not affect the eligibility for ITC, as there is no prescribed time limit for making further supplies under the GST Act.

Ruling:
The applicant is eligible to avail input tax credit on purchases of demo vehicles, which can be set off against output tax payable under GST.

---