Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant, arrested for alleged fraudulent availment and passing on of input tax credit under the GST law, was entitled to regular bail.
Analysis: The allegations arose from a documentary investigation relating to bogus invoicing and ineligible input tax credit, but the record showed substantial deposits and reversal of tax by the applicant, including payment through the electronic cash ledger and DRC-03. The Court noted that more than 10% of the disputed amount had been deposited, the applicant had no past criminal record, the material evidence was documentary and already seized, and the prosecution had not substantiated any real necessity for continued custody or any concrete risk of flight or witness influence. Applying the settled principle that detention cannot be indefinite and that bail depends on the facts of each case, the Court found further incarceration unjustified.
Conclusion: The applicant was held entitled to regular bail.
Final Conclusion: Continued custody was found unnecessary in the circumstances, and liberty was granted subject to conditions.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the investigation is substantially complete, the evidence is documentary and seized, and no concrete material shows custodial necessity or flight risk, regular bail may be granted notwithstanding the seriousness of the GST offence.