Forged certificate and GST refund fraud allegations justified denial of regular bail during ongoing investigation.

Regular bail was refused in a GST-related economic offence where Chartered Accountants were alleged to have forged and used a certificate, misused UDIN and OTP credentials, and supported fraudulent refund claims through fake or non-existent firms. The court held that the absence of an independent legal requirement for the certificate did not matter once forgery and use of a forged document were prima facie made out. Given the serious nature of the alleged offence, the early stage of investigation, the absence of a challan, and the risk of interference with inquiry or destruction of evidence, bail was declined.

---

---

Issues: Whether regular bail should be granted in a case involving alleged forging and use of a Chartered Accountant certificate, misuse of UDIN and OTP credentials, and fraudulent refund claims under the GST regime.

Analysis: The allegations disclosed that the applicants, both Chartered Accountants, were involved in issuing and using a forged certificate to facilitate refund claims through fake or non-existent firms. The court treated the absence of an independent legal requirement for the certificate as immaterial once the document was found to have been forged and used before the authorities. The conduct was viewed as extending beyond professional lapse and amounting to a serious economic offence, with prima facie offences of forgery and use of forged documents also made out. The investigation was still at a nascent stage, the challan had not been filed, and there was a reasonable apprehension that release on bail could hamper the investigation and risk destruction of evidence.

Conclusion: Bail was declined. The applications were rejected because the nature and gravity of the alleged economic offence, the forged documentation, and the pendency of investigation militated against grant of bail.

Ratio Decidendi: In cases of serious economic offences involving forged documents and ongoing investigation, bail may be refused where release is likely to impede the inquiry or permit tampering with evidence.

---