Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal grants deduction under Section 80IB(10) for housing project with minimal commercial area</h1> <h3>M/s. Macro Marvel Projects Limited Versus ITO Company Ward –IV (1), Chennai And ACIT Company Circle IV (1), Chennai Vs. M/s. Macro Marvel Projects Limited</h3> The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal, granting the deduction under Section 80IB(10) for the housing project, citing the negligible size of the ... Deduction u/s 80IB - housing project undertaken and constructed by it despite the fact that nominal part is commercial area - HELD THAT:- We noted that out of the assessee’s housing project of total built up area of 15,843.85 sq.mt., this commercial built up area constituted only 98.46 sq.mt. which is negligible and marginal. We noted that the clause permitting the housing project to include commercial area up to 5% of the aggregate built up area was brought in by legislature w.e.f. 01.04.2005 and according to us the same can be given effect to the assesse’s case retrospectively As the issue is squarely covered, we find that Hon’ble Supreme Court has gone a step further while interpreting the provisions of section 80IB(10) of the Act, made it clear that the housing project contemplates under this section that includes commercial establishments or shops also. It was further clarified that by way of amendment in the form of Clause (d), an attempt is made to restrict the size of the said shops and/ or commercial establishments. Therefore, Hon’ble Supreme Court, by necessary implication noted that the provision has to be read prospectively and not retrospectively. Accordingly, in view of the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Sarkar Builders (2015 (5) TMI 555 - SUPREME COURT] we allow the appeal of the assessee. Issues Involved:1. Entitlement to claim deduction under Section 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for a housing project with a nominal commercial area.2. Validity of the rectification order passed by CIT(A).3. Impact of the Supreme Court decision in CIT vs. Sarkar Builders on the case.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Entitlement to Claim Deduction under Section 80IB(10):The core issue is whether the assessee is entitled to claim deduction under Section 80IB(10) for a housing project that includes a nominal commercial area. The assessee initially claimed a deduction of Rs. 28,32,048/- under Section 80IB(10) for its project 'Marvel Apoorva and Wood Creek Country' and later revised the claim to Rs. 68,79,782/- for 'Marvel Apoorva' alone. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed the claim, arguing that the project included a commercial area and thus did not qualify as a housing project under Section 80IB(10). The AO noted that the commercial area was 226.72 sq.m., which included a departmental store and a committee room.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] upheld the AO's decision, stating that the commercial area exceeded the permissible limit under the Development Control Rules and that there was no provision in Section 80IB(10) for commercial areas in housing projects for the relevant assessment year.The Tribunal, however, found that the commercial area was negligible (98.46 sq.m.) and that the legislative amendment allowing commercial areas up to 5% of the aggregate built-up area, effective from 01.04.2005, could be applied retrospectively. This view was supported by the Supreme Court's decision in CIT vs. Sarkar Builders, which held that housing projects could include commercial establishments and that the amendment should be read prospectively.2. Validity of the Rectification Order Passed by CIT(A):The AO challenged the rectification order passed by CIT(A), which had rectified the earlier order. The Tribunal noted the history of appeals and rectifications, including the various dates and events leading up to the current appeal. The High Court had remitted the matter back to the Tribunal with specific directions to pass appropriate orders on merits.3. Impact of the Supreme Court Decision in CIT vs. Sarkar Builders:The Supreme Court's decision in CIT vs. Sarkar Builders was pivotal. It clarified that housing projects approved with permissible commercial use are eligible for deduction under Section 80IB(10). The Court held that the amendment restricting commercial areas, effective from 01.04.2005, should be applied prospectively. The Tribunal applied this ruling to the assessee's case, noting that the project was approved before 31.03.2005 and thus qualified for the deduction despite the commercial area.Conclusion:The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal, granting the deduction under Section 80IB(10) for the housing project, and dismissed the Revenue's appeal as academic and infructuous. The decision was pronounced on 29th June 2022.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found