TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Interest Calculation Dispute Under Section 50 of CGST Act Resolved Through Court-Ordered Consensus Approach</h1> <h3>M/s. Blue Ocean Personnel And Allied Services Private Limited Versus The Superintendent of GST & Central Excise Range-4, Chennai</h3> M/s. Blue Ocean Personnel And Allied Services Private Limited Versus The Superintendent of GST & Central Excise Range-4, Chennai - TMI Issues:1. Challenge to demand of interest under Section 50 of the CGST Act, 2017 for the period July 2017 to September 2021.Detailed Analysis:The petitioner sought a writ of certiorari challenging an order demanding interest under Section 50 of the CGST Act, 2017 for the period from July 2017 to September 2021. The petitioner acknowledged some liability towards IGST, CGST, and SGST but disputed the quantification of interest by the authority. The petitioner promptly wrote to the respondent regarding this matter, expressing concerns about the demand raised for a period dating back to 2017 and requesting time to review the computation provided. Additionally, the petitioner submitted a statement of accounts outlining its own quantification of the taxes in question.The petitioner, fearing potential recovery actions due to the lack of response to their request for a personal hearing, filed a Writ Petition challenging the quantification of interest in the impugned order. Recognizing that the remaining issue was the accurate quantification of the demand based on differing calculations between the Department and the petitioner, the court directed the petitioner to appear before the respondent without further notice on a specified date to discuss and agree on a proper quantification of the demand. The court emphasized the importance of the parties reaching a consensus on the quantification to facilitate the issuance of a fresh demand for the interest payable.Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and it was instructed to be redone based on the discussions between the parties within a specific timeframe. The Writ Petition was allowed with no costs imposed, and the connected Miscellaneous Petition was closed, concluding the legal proceedings on the matter.
TaxTMI 