Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the radios were manufactured in the industrial unit of the petitioner so as to satisfy the exemption notification issued under Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The expression "manufacture" denotes the bringing into existence of a new substance or article having a distinctive name, character or use. The radios came into existence in the petitioner's unit, even though panels supplied by another unit were used in their assembly. The mere fact that an essential component was manufactured elsewhere did not mean that the radios were manufactured in two units. The condition in the notification required manufacture in the petitioner's industrial unit, and that condition was fulfilled. The subsequent show cause notice, based on a contrary footing, could not stand.
Conclusion: The radios were manufactured in the petitioner's unit and were eligible for exemption. The order rejecting exemption and the connected show cause notice were quashed, in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Manufacture means the emergence of a new and different article, and for an exemption conditioned on manufacture in a particular unit, the relevant test is where the finished excisable goods come into existence, not where individual components are made.