Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Corporate Debtor was liable to be put into liquidation and a Liquidator appointed when no expression of interest or resolution plan was received and the Committee of Creditors unanimously recommended liquidation.
Analysis: The record showed that the corporate insolvency resolution process had continued beyond the prescribed period, no expression of interest had been received despite publication of Form G, and the Committee of Creditors had unanimously resolved to liquidate the Corporate Debtor. On these facts, the statutory scheme under Section 33 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 required the Adjudicating Authority to order liquidation once no resolution plan was forthcoming and the requisite creditor approval for liquidation had been obtained. Consequential directions were also issued for appointment of a Liquidator under Section 34 and for conduct of the liquidation process under Chapter III of the Code and the Liquidation Process Regulations.
Conclusion: Liquidation of the Corporate Debtor was ordered and a Liquidator was appointed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where no resolution plan is received and the Committee of Creditors approves liquidation with the requisite voting share, liquidation follows as a statutory consequence under Section 33 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.