Court dismisses writ petitions challenging Income Tax Act orders, petitioner advised to appeal, no costs awarded.

The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the impugned orders under Section 274 r/w Section 271 (1) (c) of the Income Tax Act, advising the petitioner to seek remedies through the Appellate Commissioner. The petitioner was granted liberty to file a statutory appeal within six weeks and urged expedited consideration by the Appellate Commissioner. The 2nd respondent was directed to act promptly on the impugned notice, with no costs awarded, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.

---

---

Issues:
Challenging impugned orders under Section 274 r/w Section 271 (1) (c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for various assessment years.

Analysis:
1. The petitioners challenged the impugned orders passed under Section 274 r/w Section 271 (1) (c) of the Income Tax Act for different assessment years. The challenge primarily focused on the vagueness of the notices issued, not clearly specifying whether there was concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate details, citing precedents from the High Court of Karnataka.

2. The petitioners argued that being a charitable institution, there was no inaccurate detail or income concealment. They highlighted ongoing legal proceedings related to their charitable status and pending appeals against assessment orders. They emphasized that even if unsuccessful in appeals, the Department could still initiate proceedings under the Act, referencing a Supreme Court decision in a similar context.

3. The petitioners contended that only the CIT appeal is competent to issue notices under the Act, and the impugned orders and notices lacked merit. They distinguished a previous court decision, asserting that the notices issued were vague and should be withdrawn based on Karnataka High Court judgments.

4. The respondent opposed the petitions, arguing they should be dismissed. They claimed the issues were covered by previous court decisions and emphasized the petitioner's awareness of ineligibility for tax exemptions due to canceled registration. The respondent highlighted the petitioner's delayed tax payments post-assessment orders as a lack of merit in the writ petitions.

5. The court examined the provisions of Section 271 (1) (c) of the Income Tax Act, empowering penalty imposition for concealing income or furnishing inaccurate particulars. It noted the petitioner's awareness of ineligibility for tax exemptions and the need to declare correct income. The court found the petitions lacking merit, advising the petitioner to seek remedies through the Appellate Commissioner and await further orders on the impugned notices.

6. The court dismissed the writ petitions, granting the petitioner liberty to pursue remedies before the Appellate Commissioner and submit to further orders. It allowed the petitioner to file a statutory appeal within six weeks, urging expedited consideration and disposal by the Appellate Commissioner. The court directed the 2nd respondent to act promptly on the impugned notice, leaving the petitioner to address any adverse orders through the Appellate Commissioner. No costs were awarded, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.

---