Court grants petitioner's application, advocates' accommodation; impugned recovery notice issued, pending further examination.

The court allowed the petitioner's application, subject to filing legible annexures before the next hearing. An advocate's accommodation request due to personal difficulty was granted, ensuring legal representation continuity. An impugned notice for recovery of a refunded amount was issued following a remand order by the Appellate Authority, indicating potential liability for the petitioner. The court expressed a preliminary view that the remand order should not trigger immediate recovery, directing further examination. The judgment provides a comprehensive analysis of the case's various aspects, emphasizing the importance of clear documentation and procedural considerations.

---

---

Issues:
1. Legibility of annexures in the petitioner's filing.
2. Accommodation request for a different advocate due to personal difficulty.
3. Impugned notice for recovery of refunded amount.
4. Effect of remand order by the Appellate Authority on recovery.

Issue 1: Legibility of annexures in the petitioner's filing
The judgment allows the petitioner's application subject to filing legible copies of annexures three days before the next hearing, emphasizing the importance of clear documentation for effective court proceedings.

Issue 2: Accommodation request for a different advocate
An advocate sought accommodation due to personal difficulty faced by the standing counsel assigned to the case. Another senior standing counsel was present in court for a different matter and was requested to assist the bench, ensuring that legal representation was maintained despite the challenges faced by the original counsel.

Issue 3: Impugned notice for recovery of refunded amount
The impugned notice dated 03.03.2022 was issued to the petitioner to show cause why the refunded amount should not be recovered. This notice was a result of an order by the Appellate Authority, remanding the matter to the adjudicatory authority for a fresh examination of the petitioner's refund claim, indicating a potential liability for the petitioner.

Issue 4: Effect of remand order on recovery
The court expressed a prima facie view that a remand order like the one issued by the Appellate Authority should not trigger recovery at that stage, highlighting the need for further examination and clarification on the matter. The senior standing counsel was directed to return with instructions on the next hearing date, indicating a need for additional information before making a final decision.

Conclusion
The judgment addresses various issues related to the petitioner's case, including the importance of clear documentation, legal representation accommodations, implications of impugned notices, and the impact of remand orders on recovery decisions. The court's detailed analysis and directions provide a comprehensive overview of the legal proceedings and the considerations involved in the case.

---