Appellant granted refund of Rs. 10 lakhs by Tribunal under Section 35 FF, entitled to 12% interest.

The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal for a refund of Rs. 10 lakhs deposited during an investigation, determining the amount as a 'revenue deposit' rather than duty, fine, or penalty. The Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to a refund with 12% interest from the deposit date to the refund date under Section 35 FF, without any limitation period, directing the original authority to make the refund.

---

---

Issues:
1. Refund of amount deposited during investigation.
2. Characterization of the deposited amount.
3. Applicability of Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
4. Entitlement to interest on the deposited amount.
5. Rejection of refund on the ground of time bar.
6. Treatment of the deposited amount as 'revenue deposit.'

Analysis:
Issue 1: The appellant sought a refund of Rs. 10 lakhs deposited during an investigation after their appeal was allowed by the Tribunal.

Issue 2: The appellant argued that the deposited amount did not constitute duty and thus should not be subject to the limitations of Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

Issue 3: The Deputy Commissioner rejected the refund claim citing Section 11B, which was upheld in the Order-in-Appeal dated 10.12.2021.

Issue 4: The appellant contended that they were entitled to interest on the deposited amount after three months of the Tribunal's final order, citing relevant case laws.

Issue 5: The appellant argued that the refund could not be denied on the grounds of time bar, even if the deposit was not made 'under protest.'

Issue 6: The Tribunal held that the deposited amount was not duty, fine, or penalty but a 'revenue deposit,' entitling the appellant to a refund with interest under Section 35 FF, without any limitation period.

The Tribunal directed the original authority to refund Rs. 10 lakhs to the appellant along with 12% interest from the date of deposit till the date of refund, allowing the appeal and emphasizing that the revenue department cannot retain the amount in the nature of a pre-deposit.

---