Tariff classification deference limits court interference where customs authorities adopt a reasonable revenue-favouring interpretation.

Imported stainless steel sheet cuttings were examined for tariff classification under competing Customs Tariff entries. The text states that customs authorities are the proper forum to determine the correct tariff entry, and that judicial interference is not warranted merely because another reasonable interpretation may favour the importer. Where two reasonable constructions are possible, the classification adopted by the authorities will not be disturbed unless it is perverse or one that no reasonable person could adopt. On that basis, the challenge to the classification failed and the authorities' view was left undisturbed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the imported stainless steel sheet cuttings were classifiable under Item 73.15(1) or Item 73.15(2) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and whether the Court should interfere with the customs authorities' classification.

Analysis: The dispute turned on the description and classification of the imported goods. The Court held that the customs authorities are the proper authority to determine the appropriate tariff entry. It also noted that where two reasonable constructions of an entry are possible, and the authorities adopt the one favourable to revenue, judicial interference is not warranted merely because another interpretation appears preferable to the importer. Interference is justified only where the classification adopted is perverse or no reasonable person could adopt it.

Conclusion: The goods' classification was left to the customs authorities, and no ground for interference was made out. The challenge failed.

---