Provisional Property Attachment Under GST Valid Before Assessment Completion, Court Upholds Section 83 Powers Despite Citation Error

The HC dismissed a writ appeal challenging property attachment under GST law. The appellant argued the attachment was premature under Section 79 as it preceded completion of court-ordered reassessment. The court clarified that despite incorrect citation, the attachment was a valid provisional measure under Section 83, designed to protect revenue during pending assessment. The court permitted the appellant to complete the reassessment process, after which further action regarding the attachment could be considered. The appeal was dismissed without costs.

---

---

Issues Involved:
Challenge to order attaching property based on Form GST DRC-16 issued by revenue.

Analysis:
The writ appeal challenged an order from the Writ Court regarding the attachment of property based on Form GST DRC-16. The appellant contended that the earlier litigation involved three assessment orders challenged in writ petitions, leading to conditional directions to deposit a specific amount for reassessment. The appellant's delay in making the deposit was rectified through extension applications and subsequent compliance. Despite seeking personal hearings, the revenue issued the impugned proceedings under Form GST DRC-16 before completing the reassessment process as directed by the court in the previous litigation. The appellant argued that the attachment order was premature under Section 79 of the GST Act, as it should only occur after reassessment. However, the court clarified that the attachment was provisional under Section 83 of the Act, valid for one year to protect revenue during assessment.

The court emphasized that incorrect citation of the law provision does not invalidate proceedings. It held that the attachment order, though mistakenly referred to as under Section 79, was a valid provisional attachment under Section 83. The court dismissed the writ appeal, stating there was no basis to interfere with the Writ Court's order. It allowed the appellant to complete the reassessment process as initiated, and only after the outcome of reassessment, further action could be taken regarding the provisional attachment order. The court concluded by dismissing the writ appeal without costs and closing the connected miscellaneous petition.

---