Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2022 (6) TMI 348 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Offshore commission not taxable in India where services were performed abroad; interest-rate issue remanded for fresh review. A non-resident's offshore distribution commission for procuring mutual fund subscriptions outside India was not taxable in India, because the services ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Offshore commission not taxable in India where services were performed abroad; interest-rate issue remanded for fresh review.

                            A non-resident's offshore distribution commission for procuring mutual fund subscriptions outside India was not taxable in India, because the services were rendered entirely abroad and no part of the relevant operations was carried out in India; the addition was deleted. Interest on rupee denominated bonds or government securities required fresh examination, as the factual basis for applying the lower rate under the relevant tax provisions had not been properly verified, and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication. The appellate direction on education cess and higher education cess was upheld, as no infirmity was shown in requiring the Assessing Officer to follow the prevailing judicial view.




                            Issues: (i) Whether offshore distribution commission received for procuring subscriptions to mutual fund schemes outside India was taxable in India as business income or deemed income; (ii) Whether interest income on rupee denominated bonds or government securities was to be taxed at the rate of 5% or 15% and whether the matter required fresh examination; (iii) Whether the directions on education cess and higher education cess required interference.

                            Issue (i): Whether offshore distribution commission received for procuring subscriptions to mutual fund schemes outside India was taxable in India as business income or deemed income.

                            Analysis: The assessee, a non-resident, carried out the distribution activity outside India and earned commission for services rendered abroad. For income to be deemed to accrue or arise in India under section 9(1)(i), read with Explanation 1(a), only such part of the income as is reasonably attributable to operations carried out in India can be brought to tax where all operations are not performed in India. The record showed that no operations relating to the commission income were carried out in India. The existence of regulation of the mutual fund activity in India did not alter the place where the assessee rendered the relevant services or earned the commission.

                            Conclusion: The offshore distribution commission was not taxable in India and the deletion of the addition was sustained, in favour of the assessee.

                            Issue (ii): Whether interest income on rupee denominated bonds or government securities was to be taxed at the rate of 5% or 15% and whether the matter required fresh examination.

                            Analysis: The tax rate applied to the interest income had been determined without a proper examination of the nature of the investment and the relevant factual basis for the assessee's claim under section 115AD read with section 194LD. Since the foundational facts were not adequately verified, the matter required a fresh adjudication by the Assessing Officer. If the investment was found to be in eligible instruments, the lower rate was to be considered.

                            Conclusion: The issue was remanded for de novo adjudication, with the assessee entitled to consideration of the lower rate if the statutory conditions were satisfied.

                            Issue (iii): Whether the directions on education cess and higher education cess required interference.

                            Analysis: The appellate direction merely required the Assessing Officer to follow the prevailing judicial view on the treatment of education cess and higher education cess in the final computation, and no infirmity was shown in that approach.

                            Conclusion: No interference was called for and the direction was upheld, against the Revenue.

                            Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenges to the commission income addition failed, the interest-rate issue was sent back for fresh determination, and the appellate directions on cess were upheld, leaving the Revenue without substantive relief.

                            Ratio Decidendi: Where a non-resident earns commission for services performed entirely outside India, such income is not chargeable in India merely because the underlying Indian business is regulated domestically; only the income reasonably attributable to operations carried out in India can be deemed to accrue or arise in India.


                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found