TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal rules in favor of assessee, overturns Rs. 9 lakh addition for unexplained investment in shares</h1> <h3>Sh. Sumer Singh Versus ACIT, Central Circle -3 New Delhi</h3> Sh. Sumer Singh Versus ACIT, Central Circle -3 New Delhi - TMI Issues:Appeal against order of Commissioner of Income Tax for assessment year 2012-13 - Addition of Rs. 9 lakhs towards unexplained investment.Detailed Analysis:1. Grounds 1, 2, 3 Dismissed:The counsel for the assessee did not press ground nos. 1, 2, and 3, leading to their dismissal. Ground no. 6, being a general ground, was not adjudicated.2. Common Issue of Unexplained Investment:Grounds 4 and 5 raised the common issue of the addition of Rs. 9 lakhs towards unexplained investment. The Assessing Officer added this amount to the assessee's income as unexplained investment, as the source of the investment could not be furnished.3. Assessee's Submission:The counsel for the assessee argued that the actual investment in shares was Rs. 3 lakhs, not Rs. 9 lakhs as alleged. The shares in question were sold and the proceeds reinvested in other shares. The counsel provided evidence to support this claim, including bank statements and purchase details.4. Department's Stand:The Departmental Representative contended that the assessee's stand was contradictory and lacked supporting evidence. Due to the controversy over the actual investment amount, they suggested the issue be sent back to the Assessing Officer for verification.5. Tribunal's Analysis and Decision:Upon review, the Tribunal found discrepancies in the Assessing Officer's calculations. The actual investments were clarified through bank statements and transaction details. It was concluded that only Rs. 3 lakhs was invested in shares during the year, with the source of funds adequately explained. The addition of Rs. 9 lakhs was deemed unjustified and deleted.6. Final Verdict:Considering the assessee's service length and financial capacity, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the addition of Rs. 9 lakhs. The appeal was allowed, and the judgment was pronounced on 17th May, 2022.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
