Appellant denied interest on duty refund pre-3 months application. Upheld ruling post application date.

The appellant's claim for interest on a refund from the date of duty deposit during investigation was denied. The Commissioner (Appeals) ruled that interest is only payable after three months from the refund application date. The Member (Judicial) upheld this decision, stating that interest on a refund is due three months after the application date, which in this case was within three months of the refund being sanctioned post the Commissioner's order. Therefore, the appellant was not entitled to interest from the date of duty deposit, and the appeal was dismissed.

---

---

Issues:
- Entitlement to interest on refund claim from the date of duty deposited during investigation.

Analysis:
The case involved the appellant who had deposited a certain amount of duty during an investigation. Subsequently, the demand for duty was dropped by the Commissioner (Appeals), leading the appellant to file a refund claim. The Adjudicating Authority sanctioned the refund claim, but the appellant contested that interest was not granted. The Commissioner (Appeals) ruled that interest on the refund claim is only payable after three months from the date of the application, not from the date of duty deposit during the investigation.

The learned Superintendent representing the Revenue reiterated that interest on a refund claim is admissible only after three months from the filing of the refund application. Citing a precedent from the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the Superintendent argued that since the refund was sanctioned within three months from the application date, no interest is applicable in this case.

Upon careful consideration, the Member (Judicial) noted that the appellant had not filed any claim or refund application until the demand was dropped by the Commissioner (Appeals). Referring to the Supreme Court decision, it was established that interest on a refund is payable only after three months from the date of the application. The relevant date for filing a refund application is one year from the date of the order from which the refund arose. In this case, the refund arose only after the Commissioner (Appeals) dropped the demand, making it unnecessary to grant interest prior to the order-in-appeal. As the refund was sanctioned within three months from the application date and arose from the Commissioner's order, no interest is payable from the date of duty deposit during the investigation.

Consequently, the Member (Judicial) concluded that the appellant is not entitled to interest on the refund from the date of duty deposit. The impugned order was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed.

---