Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition made under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in respect of deposits made out of specified bank notes collected from members during the demonetisation period was sustainable.
Analysis: The assessee explained that the impugned deposits represented collections from members in the ordinary course of business and that the transactions were recorded in the books of account. The underlying source of the cash was thus identified, and the Tribunal followed its earlier decision on identical facts to hold that mere use of demonetised notes did not by itself render the receipts unexplained. The objection based on alleged contravention of RBI restrictions was also rejected in the facts of the case, since the collections were made before the appointed date under section 5 of the Specified Bank Notes (Cessation of Liabilities) Act, 2017.
Conclusion: The addition under section 68 was not justified and was directed to be deleted.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an assessee satisfactorily explains the nature and source of cash collections and the transactions are duly recorded, such receipts cannot be treated as unexplained merely because they involve specified bank notes collected during the demonetisation period.