Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in a bail application under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, the amended twin conditions under Section 45 continue to apply and whether the materials on record made out reasonable grounds for believing that the accused was not guilty so as to warrant bail.
Analysis: The amended Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 was held to govern bail applications under the Act notwithstanding the earlier declaration of unconstitutionality in respect of the pre-amendment provision. The provisions of the Act override the general bail power under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and the statutory limitations in Section 45 operate in addition to the general principles governing bail. The statement recorded under Section 50 of the Act was treated as admissible material for bail consideration. On the materials disclosed, including the petitioner's admitted role, receipt of investor funds, commission earnings, and prima facie participation in the layering of proceeds of crime, the Court found that the petitioner's case did not satisfy the requirement of reasonable grounds for believing that he was not guilty.
Conclusion: The twin conditions under Section 45 applied, the petitioner failed to satisfy them, and bail was refused.
Ratio Decidendi: After the 2018 amendment, the twin conditions under Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 apply to bail applications under the Act, and release on bail can be granted only if the Court is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the accused is not guilty and is not likely to commit an offence while on bail.