Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sale of the land constituted a transfer of a capital asset so as to attract capital gains tax, notwithstanding the assessee's plea that possession was not actually handed over and the transaction was later reversed by a subsequent registered deed.
Analysis: The registered sale deed recorded that vacant and peaceful possession had been handed over, the full sale consideration had been received, and the purchaser became the owner. The assessee did not establish fraud, invalidity, or any reliable material to displace the contents of the registered documents. The subsequent registered deed and the belated affidavit of the purchaser did not outweigh the legal effect of the original sale deed. Oral assertions inconsistent with the registered instrument could not discredit its terms in the absence of legally cognizable grounds to do so. On these facts, the transaction satisfied the ingredients of transfer under section 2(47)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Conclusion: The transaction amounted to a taxable transfer and the addition towards long-term capital gain was correctly sustained.