Retrospective tax amendment not presumed where liability is enlarged, with interim relief granted to practising chartered accountants

An explanation inserted into Notification No. 59/98-ST was treated as enlarging tax liability rather than merely clarifying existing coverage, so it was not regarded as retrospectively applicable on the face of the notification. Management consultant services rendered by practising chartered accountants were not shown to fall within the excluded category for the relevant period, giving the appellants a prima facie case that the service was not taxable before 1-8-2002. Interim relief was therefore granted by waiving predeposit and staying recovery during pendency.

---

---

Issues: Whether the amendment introduced by the Explanation to Notification No. 59/98-ST operated retrospectively so as to make management consultant services rendered by practising chartered accountants taxable for the disputed period, and whether the appellants had made out a prima facie case for waiver of predeposit and stay.

Analysis: The Explanation was not couched in clarificatory language and appeared to enlarge the tax liability by excluding from the exemption services falling within other taxable services under section 65(90) of the Finance Act, 1994. On the face of the notification, management consultant service rendered by practising chartered accountants was not covered in the excluded list for the relevant period. The appellants therefore showed a prima facie case that the disputed service was not taxable for the period prior to 1-8-2002.

Conclusion: The Explanation was not treated as retrospective for the purpose of the stay application, and the appellants were held entitled to waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery.

Final Conclusion: The order granted interim relief to the appellants by protecting them from predeposit and recovery during the pendency of the matter.

Ratio Decidendi: An amendment that appears to enlarge tax liability, rather than merely clarify an existing position, is not to be treated as retrospectively applicable in the absence of clear legislative indication.

---