ITAT quashes rectification order under section 154, emphasizing factual accuracy over presumptions.

The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, quashing the rectification order under section 154 of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal found no apparent mistake in the assessment order justifying the rectification proceedings initiated based on objections raised by the LAP Audit. Emphasizing the importance of factual accuracy over presumptions, the ITAT concluded that the rectification order was unjustified in law. As a result, the order upholding the rectification was set aside, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.

---

---

Issues:
Challenge to rectification order under section 154 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2013-14.

Analysis:
The appeal was filed by the assessee against the order passed by the Ld Commissioner of Income Tax, National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, upholding the rectification order under section 154 of the Act. The dispute arose from the AO initiating rectification proceedings based on objections raised by the LAP Audit regarding the deduction of TDS on professional and advertisement charges. The AO added a sum to the assessed income under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. The assessee objected to the initiation of rectification proceedings, contending that there was no mistake apparent from the record justifying such proceedings. The Ld AR argued that the objections were based on presumptions and calculations by the internal audit party, not on the assessment record. The assessee had furnished details during the original assessment proceedings, showing that TDS was deducted as per the prescribed limits. The Ld DR, however, supported the initiation of rectification proceedings due to the alleged shortfall in TDS deduction by the assessee.

The ITAT, after considering the submissions, held that there was no mistake apparent on record to justify the initiation of rectification proceedings under section 154. The tribunal observed that the internal audit party's presumptions were not sufficient grounds for rectification. The Ld AR demonstrated that the necessary details were provided to the AO during the original assessment, showing compliance with TDS requirements. The tribunal emphasized that the objections were based on conjectures and not on factual discrepancies in the assessment order. Therefore, the tribunal concluded that the rectification order was unjustified in law and proceeded to quash it. Consequently, the order passed by the Ld CIT(A) upholding the rectification was set aside, and the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed.

In conclusion, the ITAT's judgment favored the assessee by ruling that the initiation of rectification proceedings under section 154 was unwarranted, as there were no apparent mistakes in the assessment order. The tribunal emphasized the importance of factual accuracy over presumptions and conjectures in such proceedings, ultimately leading to the quashing of the rectification order.

---