DTA clearance exemption: authorised product descriptions and technical support can establish similarity with exported goods.

DTA clearances made with Development Commissioner approval can qualify for exemption under Notification No. 23/2003-CE where the cleared goods are similar to the exported goods and the record supports that position. The article notes that authorised product descriptions, a Chartered Engineer's certificate, and the absence of contrary departmental evidence were sufficient to establish similarity for precision optical components and related assemblies. On that basis, denial of the exemption was unsustainable, and the resulting duty demand and penalty could not stand. The discussion emphasises that mere lack of further technical proof from the assessee does not justify refusal of the exemption when the surrounding record points to similarity.

---

---

Issues: Whether the goods cleared in the Domestic Tariff Area were "similar" to the exported goods so as to qualify for exemption under Notification No. 23/2003-CE and whether the demand and penalty based on denial of that exemption could stand.

Analysis: The units were authorised to manufacture precision optical components, instrument assemblies and sub-assemblies, and DTA clearances were made under permissions issued by the Development Commissioner. The exemption under the notification applies where DTA clearances are made in accordance with the Foreign Trade Policy and the goods, other than scrap or remnants, are similar to the exported goods. The record contained no material showing that the cleared goods fell outside the licensed product category or were dissimilar to the exported goods. A Chartered Engineer's certificate supported the similarity of the goods, and there was no rebuttal evidence to displace that expert opinion. The prior view that the same line of products constituted similar goods also supported the assessee's case. Mere absence of further technical proof from the assessee could not justify denial of the exemption when the departmental permission itself and the surrounding record pointed to similarity.

Conclusion: The goods were held to be similar goods, the exemption could not be denied, and the duty demand as well as the penalty were unsustainable.

Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief according to law.

Ratio Decidendi: Where DTA clearances are made with Development Commissioner approval and the revenue adduce no contrary evidence, a supported technical opinion and the authorised product description can establish that the DTA goods are similar to the exported goods for purposes of the exemption.

---