Customs house agent misconduct requires a direct accounting duty; licence revocation failed on the contractual facts.

A customs house agent's licence revocation for alleged failure to account for funds and misappropriation was held unsustainable because the accounting obligation arose from the contractual arrangement with the foreign supplier, not the Indian purchaser. On the facts, the funds routed through the Indian purchaser were meant to discharge that contractual obligation, so Regulation 14(g) could not be applied to treat the agent as owing a direct accounting duty to the purchaser. The allegation of misappropriation was therefore unsupported, and disciplinary action under Regulation 21(c) could not stand. The revocation order was set aside.

---

---

Issues: Whether the revocation of the customs house agent's licence on the ground of alleged failure to account for funds and alleged misappropriation was sustainable under the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 1984.

Analysis: The agent was engaged by the foreign supplier, not by the Indian purchaser, and the contractual responsibility for customs clearance rested on the foreign supplier. The funds routed through the Indian purchaser were for use in discharging that contractual obligation, but the legal relationship of accounting was between the agent and the foreign supplier or its representative. On those facts, the duty under Regulation 14(g) could not be invoked as if the agent owed a direct accounting obligation to the Indian purchaser. The finding of misappropriation was therefore unsupported, and the alleged misconduct could not sustain action under Regulation 21(c).

Conclusion: The revocation order was unsustainable and was set aside in favour of the petitioner.

Final Conclusion: The disciplinary action against the customs house agent failed because the alleged non-accounting and misappropriation were not legally made out on the contractual and factual matrix.

Ratio Decidendi: A customs house agent cannot be held guilty of misconduct for failure to account to a party with whom it has no direct contractual or accounting relationship, and revocation of licence cannot rest on an unsustainable allegation of misappropriation.

---