NAPA dismisses anti-profiteering case against developer as project phases fell outside GST implementation period under Section 171

NAPA dismissed anti-profiteering allegations against a developer regarding two flats in Project River View Heights. The Authority found Phase-I was completed before GST implementation (August 2014), Phase-III had not commenced by August 2020, and Phase-II was previously investigated under separate proceedings with confirmed profiteering of Rs. 2,13,468. Since the relevant phases were either pre-GST or not operational during GST period, Section 171 CGST Act anti-profiteering provisions were inapplicable to the instant case.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Violation of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017.
2. Quantum of profiteering.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Violation of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017:

The core issue was whether the Respondent violated Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017, which mandates passing on the benefit of reduced tax rates or increased Input Tax Credit (ITC) to consumers by reducing prices. The Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) initially investigated Phase-II of the Respondent's project "River View Heights" and confirmed that the Respondent had benefited from ITC amounting to Rs. 2,13,468/- (including GST) during the period from 01.04.2017 to 31.10.2018, which was not passed on to the home buyers. This led to an order directing the Respondent to pass on the benefit along with interest at 18%.

Upon further investigation, the DGAP was directed to examine the entire project, including Phases I and III. The DGAP found that Phase-I was completed before the implementation of GST (01.07.2017), and Phase-III had not started construction as of the investigation date. Therefore, the anti-profiteering provisions under Section 171 were not applicable to these phases. The investigation confirmed that Phase-II had already been scrutinized, and the profiteering amount was established.

2. Quantum of Profiteering:

The DGAP’s detailed analysis confirmed the profiteered amount for Phase-II as Rs. 2,13,468/- (including GST @12%) for the period 01.07.2017 to 31.10.2018. This amount was to be passed on to the 26 home buyers of Phase-II. For Phases I and III, since Phase-I was completed before GST implementation and Phase-III had not commenced, no profiteering was determined for these phases. The DGAP’s findings were supported by the Respondent’s submissions and verified through the RERA website, confirming that only Phase-II was registered under RERA and subject to GST.

Conclusion:

The Authority concluded that the Respondent did not violate Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017, for Phases I and III of the "River View Heights" project. The anti-profiteering provisions were inapplicable to these phases as Phase-I was completed pre-GST and Phase-III had not started. The profiteering for Phase-II had already been established and addressed in the previous order. Consequently, the proceedings against the Respondent were concluded, and the DGAP’s report dated 27.08.2020 was accepted.

Order:

The order was passed within the prescribed limitation period, considering the extensions granted by the Supreme Court due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Copies of the order were supplied to the applicants and the Respondent for necessary actions, and the file was consigned after completion.

---