Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the writ petition should be disposed of by leaving it open to the petitioner to seek installment facility and restoration of GST registration under the applicable GST framework.
Analysis: The petition arose from rejection of the appeal and the consequential cancellation of GST registration. The grievance before the Court was substantially concerned with the petitioner's request to pay the tax liability in instalments and to have the registration restored so that business could continue. The Court noted that the petitioner had deposited the amount required under the earlier order and that the statutory route under Section 80 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and Rule 23 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 was available for seeking the reliefs.
Conclusion: The writ petition was not decided on merits of the cancellation order and was disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioner to file the appropriate applications, which were directed to be considered expeditiously.
Final Conclusion: The matter was brought to a close by directing the petitioner to pursue the statutory applications before the authority, with no adjudication on the substantive challenge to the cancellation.