ITAT directs deletion of income addition, finding assessee's explanations satisfactory.

The ITAT allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the Rs.36,25,000/- addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT found that the assessee adequately explained the cash deposits through verified vouchers, criticizing the lack of further investigation by the Assessing Officer. The burden of proof was considered discharged by the assessee, leading to the deletion of the addition and a direction to recompute the income accordingly.

---

---

Issues:
- Addition of Rs.36,25,000/- made under section 68 of the Income Tax Act in relation to cash deposits into the bank account of the assessee.

Analysis:
1. The Assessing Officer observed cash deposits of Rs.36,25,000/- in the bank account of the assessee and requested details and documentary evidence. The assessee explained that the company faced heavy losses, leading to closure, and proceeds from scrap sales were used to repay loans.

2. The Assessing Officer treated the cash deposits as unexplained cash credits under section 68 due to lack of evidence. Additionally, Rs.19,20,000/- received from a sister concern was also considered a cash credit.

3. The CIT(A) deleted the Rs.19,20,000/- addition, citing proof of identity and creditworthiness with the sister concern. However, the Rs.36,25,000/- addition from scrap sales proceeds was upheld as the assessee failed to produce vendors before the Assessing Officer.

4. The assessee contended that the scrap sales were genuine, evidenced by verified vouchers. The CIT(A) upheld the addition based on incomplete vouchers and lack of vendor appearance, despite the Assessing Officer verifying all original vouchers without discrepancies.

5. The ITAT noted the assessee's explanation, supported by original vouchers, and the lack of further inquiry by the Assessing Officer. Citing the Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment, the ITAT held that the assessee had explained the cash deposits adequately, directing the deletion of the Rs.36,25,000/- addition under section 68.

6. The ITAT emphasized that the assessee's burden was discharged with the explanation and verified vouchers, criticizing the lack of further investigation by the Assessing Officer. Consequently, the ITAT allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to recompute the income accordingly.

---