Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether deduction under section 80IB(10) could be allowed when it was not claimed in the return of income filed within the due date under section 139(1), and whether the receipt could alternatively be assessed as capital gains.
Analysis: Section 80A(5), read with section 139(1), makes a claim for deduction under Chapter VI-A a mandatory condition to be satisfied in the return of income filed within the prescribed due date. The Tribunal held that the assessee had not made the claim in the return in the manner required by law, and therefore the deduction could not be entertained even in appellate proceedings. The Tribunal also held that the alternative plea that the amount should be assessed as capital gains was inconsistent with the assessee's own stand that the income arose from development activity and was business income.
Conclusion: The claim for deduction under section 80IB(10) was rejected, and the alternative claim for assessment under the head capital gains was also rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: A deduction under Chapter VI-A cannot be allowed unless the claim is made in the return of income filed within the time prescribed under section 139(1), and a fresh claim not so made is barred by section 80A(5).