Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether short-term capital gains arose on the sale of immovable property in the year under appeal, and whether the matter required remand for verification of receipt of consideration and handing over of possession.
Analysis: The registered sale deed, the AIR information, and the surrounding documents indicated a completed transaction, but the assessee disputed receipt of consideration and the delivery of possession. The record also showed conflicting material regarding payment details, possession, and post-sale conduct, and the factual position of the co-owner and the purchaser's compliance was not investigated fully. In these circumstances, the issue whether the transfer was completed in the manner attracting section 45(1) and section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 read with section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 could not be finally resolved on the existing record.
Conclusion: The addition could not be finally sustained or deleted on the present material, and the matter was required to be sent back for fresh factual examination and a speaking order.
Final Conclusion: The dispute was restored for verification of the essential facts before a fresh decision on taxability, and the Revenue's appeal succeeded only for statistical purposes.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the existence of transfer for capital gains purposes depends on disputed facts about receipt of consideration and handing over of possession, and the record is inconclusive, the matter should be remitted for factual verification before a final finding is recorded.