Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether fatty acid and the tin containers/HDPE jars arising or used in the course of manufacture of refined palm oil and vanaspati ghee were entitled to exemption under the relevant notifications.
Analysis: The products in question arose incidentally in the course of refining palm oil and manufacturing vanaspati, and the value realised from such products could not determine whether they were manufactured excisable goods. Applying the ratio that unwanted materials removed during refining are waste and not manufactured final products, the incidental products were treated as waste arising during manufacture. The packing materials manufactured in-house were also found to be exempt goods, and their captive use within the factory did not defeat the exemption claimed under the notification governing goods consumed within the factory of production.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 89/1995-CE for the incidental products, and the denial of exemption on the basis of manufacture of tin containers and HDPE jars was not sustainable.
Final Conclusion: The impugned orders were set aside and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Incidental products arising during the refining/manufacturing process, which are in substance waste or refuse and not independently manufactured excisable goods, are entitled to exemption where the notification covers such waste or goods consumed within the factory.