Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Works contract for replacing bridge sleepers with H-Beam steel sleepers ruled ineligible for GST notification benefits</h1> <h3>In Re: M/s. Utkarsh India Limited</h3> In Re: M/s. Utkarsh India Limited - 2022 (67) G. S. T. L. 109 (A. A. R. - GST - W. B.) Issues Involved:1. Whether dismantling of existing sleeper fixing and/or installation of new (H-Beam Steel sleepers) amounts to execution of original work and attracts IGST @12% as per Notification No. 20/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 22.08.2017.2. Whether the applicant is eligible for the benefit of Notification No. 20/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 22.08.2017 by paying IGST @ 12% for construction, erection, commission, or installation of original works pertaining to Railways.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Whether dismantling of existing sleeper fixing and/or installation of new (H-Beam Steel sleepers) amounts to execution of original work and attracts IGST @12% as per Notification No. 20/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 22.08.2017:The applicant was awarded a contract by East Coast Railways for dismantling existing bridge timber/steel channel sleepers and installing H-Beam steel sleepers. The applicant contends that this work is original work and not repair or maintenance, thus eligible for IGST @12% under Notification No. 20/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 22.08.2017.The Authority examined whether the work qualifies as 'original work' under clause 2 (zs) of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, which defines original works as:- All new constructions;- Additions and alterations to abandoned or damaged structures to make them workable;- Erection, commissioning, or installation of plant, machinery, or equipment or structures.The Authority found that the work involves replacing old sleepers with new ones, not constructing a new bridge or laying a new track. The work order specifies the unit as 'per sleeper,' indicating the contract is for replacement, not new construction. Therefore, the work doesn't qualify as 'original work' under the given definition.Ruling:The supply is a composite supply of works contract as defined in clause (119) of section 2 of the GST Act but does not qualify as 'original work' under clause 2 (zs) of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. Hence, it does not attract IGST @12% under Notification No. 20/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 22.08.2017.2. Whether the applicant is eligible for the benefit of Notification No. 20/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 22.08.2017 by paying IGST @ 12% for construction, erection, commission, or installation of original works pertaining to Railways:The applicant argued that the work is not repair or maintenance but new construction, thus eligible for the benefit of the said notification. However, the Authority determined that the work involves replacing existing sleepers, not new construction or significant alterations to abandoned or damaged structures.Ruling:The applicant is not eligible for the benefit of Notification No. 20/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 22.08.2017 by paying IGST @ 12% for the said works, as the work does not qualify as 'original work.'Conclusion:The Authority concluded that the work of dismantling and installing new sleepers does not amount to original work and does not attract IGST @12%. The applicant is not eligible for the benefits of Notification No. 20/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 22.08.2017.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found