ITAT partially allows appeal: Stock suppression dismissed, cash deposits upheld under Section 69A

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) partly allowed the appeal. It vacated the addition of Rs. 39,10,932/- for the alleged suppression of closing stock but upheld the addition of Rs. 6,00,000/- under Section 69A for unexplained cash deposits. The ITAT found that the Assessing Officer had failed to provide evidence against the revised stock statement and dismissed the addition related to suppression of closing stock. The decision was pronounced on 21.03.2022.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Addition on account of excess stock.
2. Addition on account of unexplained cash credit under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Addition on Account of Excess Stock:
The assessee, engaged in the bullion trade, filed a return declaring an income of Rs. 4,02,710/-. During scrutiny, the Assessing Officer (A.O) observed discrepancies in the stock statement provided by the assessee. The A.O noted unrecorded sales transactions amounting to 1451.240 grams of bullion, which were not reflected in the original stock statement. Consequently, the A.O added Rs. 44,45,306/- to the returned income for these unrecorded sales and further added Rs. 39,10,932/- for suppression of 1330.29 grams of closing stock.

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] vacated the addition of Rs. 44,45,306/- after considering a revised stock statement filed by the assessee but upheld the addition of Rs. 39,10,932/- for suppression of closing stock. The ITAT observed that the CIT(A) had inconsistently accepted the revised stock statement to vacate one addition but ignored it for the other. The ITAT found that the A.O had failed to provide evidence against the revised stock statement and noted that the A.O had arbitrarily rejected it without pointing out specific discrepancies. The ITAT thus vacated the addition of Rs. 39,10,932/- and allowed Ground No. 1 of the appeal.

2. Addition on Account of Unexplained Cash Credit under Section 68:
The A.O added Rs. 6,00,000/- as unexplained cash credit, which was deposited in the assessee's bank account. The CIT(A) sustained this addition under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act, which deals with unexplained money. The assessee argued that the amount was from common funds with his son and that cash deposits in a bank should not be considered as money under Section 69A.

The ITAT rejected the assessee's explanation regarding the source of funds and upheld the CIT(A)'s application of Section 69A. The ITAT referred to various judicial precedents and concluded that cash deposits in a bank account do not lose their character as money. The ITAT found no merit in the assessee's argument that Section 69A should not apply to bank deposits and dismissed Ground No. 2 of the appeal.

General Grounds:
The Grounds of appeal no(s). 3 & 4 were dismissed as not pressed.

Conclusion:
The appeal was partly allowed. The ITAT vacated the addition of Rs. 39,10,932/- related to the alleged suppression of closing stock but upheld the addition of Rs. 6,00,000/- under Section 69A for unexplained cash deposits. The order was pronounced in the open court on 21.03.2022.

---