Court rules against re-opening assessment under Section 148 of Income Tax Act

The Court ruled in favor of the Petitioner, holding that the re-opening of the assessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act was not justified as the issues raised had already been considered during the original assessment proceedings under Section 143(3). The Court emphasized that the mere absence of specific discussion in the assessment order did not negate the consideration of the raised issues. Consequently, the Court allowed the petition, quashed the notice under Section 148, the order rejecting objections, and the subsequent notice under Section 143(3), with no order as to costs.

---

---

Issues:
1. Validity of notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961
2. Rejection of objections by the Petitioner
3. Assessment proceedings under Section 143(3)
4. Consideration of issues during original assessment proceedings
5. Change of opinion as a basis for re-opening assessment

Analysis:

1. The Petitioner challenged a notice dated 30th March, 2021, issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, along with an Order dated 24th February, 2022, rejecting the Petitioner's objections and a subsequent notice dated 25th February, 2022, issued under Section 143(3). The notice was based on two main issues: payments to senior employees and a difference in VAT returns.

2. The Petitioner had filed its return of income for A.Y. 2017-2018, declaring income at Rs. 19,08,72,160. The assessment proceedings under Section 143(3) were completed on 16th December, 2019, assessing the income at the same amount.

3. The reasons for re-opening the assessment included payments made to senior employees and the difference in VAT returns. The Petitioner's objections to the re-opening were rejected by an Order dated 24th February, 2022.

4. The Petitioner argued that since an assessment had already been completed under Section 143(3), proposing to re-open the assessment based on a change of opinion was not permissible. The issues raised during re-opening were claimed to have been considered during the original assessment proceedings.

5. The Respondent contended that the amounts paid as incentives to senior employees were actually a share of dividend, which had not been considered in the original assessment. However, the Court held that the issues raised in the re-opening notice were indeed subject to consideration during the original assessment proceedings.

6. The Court emphasized that once a query is raised during assessment proceedings and the assessee responds, it is deemed to have been considered by the Assessing Officer. The absence of specific discussion in the assessment order does not negate the consideration of the raised issues.

7. The Court noted that the issues of incentives to senior employees and the difference in VAT turnover were addressed during the original assessment proceedings. Therefore, the re-opening of the assessment based on a change of opinion was not justified as it did not indicate that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment.

8. Consequently, the Court allowed the petition and quashed the notice under Section 148, the order rejecting objections, and the subsequent notice under Section 143(3). The petition was disposed of with no order as to costs.

---