Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal was justified in dismissing the second appeals for want of compliance with the pre-deposit order, and whether the dismissal order deserved to be quashed with a direction to deposit the amount and have the appeals heard on merits.
Analysis: The appeal was under Section 78 of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003. The Tribunal had dismissed the second appeals solely because the pre-deposit directed earlier had not been complied with. During hearing before the High Court, the appellant expressed readiness to deposit 20% of the total liability fixed as pre-deposit, namely Rs. 8 lakh towards GVAT dues and Rs. 13,000 towards CST dues. In view of that statement, the Court set aside the Tribunal's dismissal order and directed deposit of the stated amounts within two weeks, after which the First Appellate Authority was to hear the appeals on merits and decide them in accordance with law.
Conclusion: The dismissal order for non-compliance with pre-deposit was set aside, and the appellant was permitted to proceed with the appeals on depositing the specified amounts.