Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to a direction for consideration of its representation and acceptance of payment under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 after expiry of the time prescribed for payment.
Analysis: The petitioner failed to deposit the determined amount within the extended time up to 30.06.2020. The communication dated 14.07.2020 was treated as an internal exercise to collect information from declarants who had not paid, and not as an extension of the scheme or of the time for making payment. Once the scheme had come to an end, no further benefit could be extended on the basis of a subsequent representation, and a direction to decide such representation would serve no useful purpose.
Conclusion: The petitioner was not entitled to any relief under the scheme after its expiry, and the writ petition was dismissed.