Operational leasing companies cannot treat on-road component recoveries as pure agent services under Section 15(2)

The AAR Tamil Nadu ruled that on-road components (registration fees, road tax, insurance premiums) paid by an operational leasing company cannot be treated as pure agent services. The Authority held that these charges are incidental expenses necessary to make vehicles road-worthy before leasing, forming part of the taxable supply value under Section 15(2) of GST Act. The applicant failed to establish pure agent status as they paid charges to fulfill statutory requirements under Motor Vehicles Act for their own leasing business, not on behalf of the lessee. Therefore, on-road component recoveries from lessees constitute part of taxable leasing services.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Whether the applicant can be construed as a pure agent under Rule 33 of the CGST Rules 2017 and TNGST Rules 2017.
2. Whether the registration & Motor Vehicle life tax & RTO charges, insurance premium, etc., paid by the applicant and reimbursed by the lessee should be excluded from the value of the supply transaction (leasing).
3. If not considered as a pure agent, whether such payments can be treated as separate services with GST applicable at the general rate of 18%.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Whether the applicant can be construed as a pure agent under Rule 33 of the CGST Rules 2017 and TNGST Rules 2017:

The applicant, a Non-Banking Financial Company, leases vehicles and pays for additional services like road tax, registration fees, and insurance premiums, which are then reimbursed by the lessee. The applicant argued that these payments should be treated as those made by a pure agent, thereby excluding them from the value of the taxable supply.

The ruling examined the criteria for a pure agent under Rule 33, which requires:
- The supplier acts as a pure agent of the recipient when making payments to third parties on authorization.
- Payments made by the pure agent on behalf of the recipient are separately indicated in the invoice.
- The supplies procured by the pure agent from third parties are in addition to the services supplied on their own account.

The ruling found that the applicant did not meet these criteria. The applicant did not have a contractual agreement to act as a pure agent, and the payments for on-road components were made in their own interest to make the vehicle roadworthy, not on behalf of the lessee.

2. Whether the registration & Motor Vehicle life tax & RTO charges, insurance premium, etc., paid by the applicant and reimbursed by the lessee should be excluded from the value of the supply transaction (leasing):

The ruling emphasized that the value of supply under GST includes any incidental expenses incurred by the supplier in respect of the supply of goods or services. The applicant’s payments for registration fees, motor vehicle life tax, and insurance premiums were deemed incidental expenses necessary to make the vehicle roadworthy for leasing. These payments were thus considered part of the value of the supply of the leasing services and could not be excluded.

3. If not considered as a pure agent, whether such payments can be treated as separate services with GST applicable at the general rate of 18%:

The ruling concluded that the payments made by the applicant for on-road components are part of the leasing service's value and should be taxed at the rate applicable to the leasing service, which is 28% along with the applicable cess. The suggestion to treat these payments as separate services with a general GST rate of 18% was not accepted.

Conclusion:

1. The applicant is not considered a pure agent under Rule 33 of the CGST/TNGST Rules 2017.
2. Payments made by the applicant for Motor Vehicle Registration fee, Motor Vehicle life Tax, RTO charges, etc., which are recovered from the lessee, form part of the value of the supply of leasing services and are taxable as such.
3. The ruling did not accept the proposal to treat these payments as separate services with a lower GST rate.

Ruling:
1. The additional services rendered by the applicant in the course of leasing vehicles do not fall under the category of "services of a pure agent."
2. Additional payments made by the applicant for on-road components, which are recovered from the lessee, form part of the taxable supply of leasing services.

---