Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount shown as royalty could be included in the transaction value of imported goods, and whether the matter required remand for examination of actual payment and its nexus with the sale.
Analysis: The declared value had earlier been accepted under Rule 3(3)(a) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 2007. In the present proceedings, the dispute turned on whether the royalty entry in the financial statements represented an actual payment to the foreign supplier and whether such payment, if any, was a condition of sale. The absence of any royalty agreement, along with the appellant's financial statements, chartered accountant's certificate, and ledger entries, meant that the evidentiary record required fuller scrutiny. The material already on record was insufficient to conclusively determine whether royalty had in fact been paid or whether the amount stood reversed later.
Conclusion: The royalty amount could not be straightaway included in the transaction value on the existing record, and the issue was remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration of actual payment and its effect on valuation.
Ratio Decidendi: Royalty can be added to transaction value only when it is shown to be actually paid and to form a condition of sale of the imported goods.