Tribunal Rulings on Property Expenses and Capital Gains: Brokerage, Fair Market Value, Deductions

Restriction of Property Sale Expenses: The Tribunal directed the AO to allow brokerage expenses of Rs. 2,45,000/-, partially substantiating the claim. Determination of Fair Market Value: The Tribunal revised the land's FMV to Rs. 5,700/- per cent as of 1.4.1981. Rejection of Claim of Cost of Improvement: The Tribunal upheld the rejection of Rs. 4 lakhs claim for air conditioners. Rejection of Enhanced Claim of Deduction under Section 54: The Tribunal allowed the enhanced deduction of Rs. 1,48,26,257/-, citing compliance with investment timelines. The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, instructing the AO to recalculate long-term capital gains.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Restriction of property sale expenses.
2. Determination of fair market value as on 1.4.1981.
3. Rejection of claim of cost of improvement.
4. Rejection of enhanced claim of deduction under Section 54 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Restriction of Property Sale Expenses:
The assessee claimed expenses on the sale of house property amounting to Rs. 5,20,400/-, including brokerage of Rs. 4,92,400/- and advocate fee of Rs. 30,000/-. The AO allowed only Rs. 30,000/- for advocate fee, rejecting the brokerage claim due to lack of proof. The assessee provided an acknowledgment from the broker, Shri K.T. Verghese, but it was on the assessee’s letterhead, which the AO did not accept. The Ld. CIT(A) confirmed this decision. Upon review, the Tribunal noted that the assessee, an NRI residing in the USA, had consistently claimed to have paid brokerage. The only supporting evidence was a bank statement showing a payment of Rs. 4,90,000/- to Shri K.T. Verghese. The Tribunal concluded that while the entire brokerage claim could not be substantiated, a partial allowance was justified. Therefore, the Tribunal directed the AO to allow brokerage expenses of Rs. 2,45,000/-.

2. Determination of Fair Market Value as on 1.4.1981:
The assessee estimated the fair market value (FMV) of the land at Rs. 25,000/- per cent and the building at Rs. 1,00,000/- as of 1.4.1981. The AO accepted the building's value but adopted Rs. 1,000/- per cent for the land based on sub-registrar office data. The Ld. CIT(A) considered a certificate from the Tahsildar, Thrissur, estimating the property value at Rs. 4,52,000/- for 62 cents and a building, and adjusted the land value to Rs. 4,000/- per cent. The Tribunal reviewed this and corrected the building's value to Rs. 1,00,000/-, resulting in an FMV of Rs. 5,700/- per cent for the land as of 1.4.1981, directing the AO to adopt this revised value.

3. Rejection of Claim of Cost of Improvement:
The assessee claimed Rs. 5 lakhs for improvements, including Rs. 1 lakh for civil work and Rs. 4 lakhs for air conditioners. The AO allowed only Rs. 1 lakh, rejecting the air conditioners' cost, which the Ld. CIT(A) upheld. The Tribunal agreed with the Ld. CIT(A) that air conditioners are categorized as furnishings improving living conditions, not enhancing the building's value or longevity. Thus, the Tribunal confirmed the rejection of the Rs. 4 lakhs claim for air conditioners.

4. Rejection of Enhanced Claim of Deduction under Section 54:
The assessee initially claimed a deduction of Rs. 1,18,00,620/- under Section 54 but sought to increase it to Rs. 1,48,26,257/- before the AO. The AO rejected this enhanced claim, citing the need for a revised return and non-deposit in the Capital Gains Account Scheme. The Ld. CIT(A) upheld this decision, referencing the Supreme Court's ruling in Goetze India Limited. However, the Tribunal noted that the Supreme Court's decision does not restrict the Tribunal's power to admit additional claims. The Tribunal referenced the Karnataka High Court's ruling in Fatima Bai Vs. ITO, which allows the deduction if the investment is made within the extended period under Section 139(4). The Tribunal found that the assessee invested in the new house within the stipulated time and directed the AO to allow the deduction of Rs. 1,48,26,257/-.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeal, directing the AO to recompute the long-term capital gains as per the Tribunal's directions. The order was pronounced in the open court on 4th April 2022.

---