TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal overturns CIT(A)'s decision, upholds assessment order citing violations of IT Act sections 13(1)(c) and 13(1)(d).</h1> <h3>The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) -II, Chennai. Versus M/s. Sri Vekkaliamman Educational and Charitable Trust</h3> The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) -II, Chennai. Versus M/s. Sri Vekkaliamman Educational and Charitable Trust - TMI Issues:1. Disallowance of depreciation.2. Violation of sec.13(3)(a) read with sec.13(1)(c)(ii) of the Act.3. Transactions with specific companies.4. Purchase of gold coins.5. Utilization of loan funds.6. Violation of provisions of section 11(5), 13(1)(c), 13(3)(a), and 13(1)(d) of the Act.1. Disallowance of Depreciation:The CIT(A) allowed depreciation as an allowable deduction based on case laws and judicial discipline favoring the assessee, leading to the deletion of the addition made by the assessing officer. The AR successfully argued for the deduction of depreciation, citing relevant case laws and conflicting decisions of High Courts. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision in this regard.2. Violation of sec.13(3)(a) read with sec.13(1)(c)(ii) of the Act:The assessing officer concluded violations based on amounts due from specific entities. However, the AR successfully argued against these violations by referencing previous ITAT orders and the nature of transactions with the mentioned companies. The Tribunal agreed with the AR's contentions and held that no violation of sec.13 of the Act occurred.3. Transactions with Specific Companies:The Department contended that transactions with certain companies involved interested persons as per Section 13(3) of the IT Act, 1961. The Department argued that these transactions violated provisions of Section 13(1)(c) and 13(1)(d), rendering Section 11 inoperative. The Tribunal noted the involvement of interested persons and held that the appellant trust had indeed violated the specified sections, leading to the reversal of the CIT(A)'s decision.4. Purchase of Gold Coins:The purchase of gold coins by the appellant was justified as meant for distributing medals to students. The Tribunal deemed this a normal transaction not covered by sec.11(5) of the Act, rejecting the AO's contentions regarding the utilization of gold coins.5. Utilization of Loan Funds:The AO's contention that loan funds were utilized for various purposes was rejected by the AR, stating no prohibition in the Income Tax Act for availing loans from financial institutions. The Tribunal agreed with the AR, dismissing the AO's contentions as devoid of merit.6. Violation of Provisions of Section 11(5), 13(1)(c), 13(3)(a), and 13(1)(d) of the Act:The Tribunal reviewed the violations under sections 11(5), 13(1)(c), 13(3)(a), and 13(1)(d) of the Act. It found that the appellant trust had indeed violated the provisions of section 13(1)(c) and 13(1)(d), leading to the reversal of the CIT(A)'s decision and restoration of the assessment order.In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal of the revenue, reversing the CIT(A)'s decision and restoring the assessment order based on the violations of specified sections of the IT Act.
TaxTMI 