Revision petition quashed, petitioner acquitted in NI Act case. Reduced compounding fee due in 6 weeks.

The revision petition challenged the petitioner's conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, resulting in a settlement between the parties. The complainant withdrew the complaint upon receiving the compensation. The court quashed the convictions and sentences, acquitting the petitioner. The petitioner, a widow with three children, was directed to deposit a reduced compounding fee of Rs. 2,000 within six weeks. Failure to comply would revive the convictions. The Trial Court was ordered to release Rs. 2,50,000 to the complainant from the deposited amount. The judgment disposed of the petition and directed release of funds to the complainant without notice to the petitioner.

---

---

Issues:
1. Appeal against conviction under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
2. Settlement between parties for withdrawal of complaint.
3. Exemption from compounding fee for the petitioner.
4. Direction to deposit compounding fee.
5. Release of deposited amount to the complainant.
6. Disposition of the petition and related applications.

Analysis:
1. The judgment concerns a revision petition challenging the conviction of the petitioner-accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Sessions Judge affirmed the lower court's decision of sentencing the accused to six months of simple imprisonment and awarding compensation of Rs. 5,00,000 to the complainant. However, the matter was settled amicably between the parties, leading to the withdrawal of the complaint by the complainant.

2. Both counsels confirmed the settlement, with the complainant agreeing to withdraw the complaint upon receiving the entire compensation amount. As a result, the complaint related to the dishonor of the cheque was treated as withdrawn, and the convictions and sentences imposed by the lower courts were quashed, leading to the acquittal of the petitioner-accused from the accusations.

3. The petitioner, a widow with three children, sought exemption from the compounding fee. Citing relevant legal precedents, the counsel requested leniency in waiving the fee. The court considered the circumstances and directed the petitioner to deposit Rs. 2,000 as the compounding fee with the State Legal Services Authority within six weeks, deviating from the usual 15% of the cheque amount requirement.

4. Following the directive, the petitioner was instructed to provide a copy of the receipt of the compounding fee deposit to the court. Failure to comply within eight weeks would result in the automatic revival of the convictions and sentences. Additionally, the Trial Court was ordered to release Rs. 2,50,000 along with any accrued interest to the complainant from the amount deposited by the petitioner.

5. The judgment concluded by disposing of the petition and any pending applications in accordance with the terms outlined. The court also directed the release of the specified amount to the complainant without notice to the petitioner. Finally, a copy of the judgment was to be sent to the State Legal Services Authority for necessary action, allowing parties to use downloaded copies for official purposes without the need for certified copies.

---