Advance ruling jurisdiction limited to applicant's own supplies; recipient cannot seek binding ruling on another supplier's tax liability.

Advance ruling jurisdiction is limited to supplies of goods or services undertaken or proposed to be undertaken by the applicant. Where the service is supplied by a third party to the applicant, the recipient cannot seek a binding ruling on the supplier's outward tax liability, because such a ruling would not bind that supplier. The transaction therefore falls outside the intended scope of the advance ruling mechanism, and the application was held not maintainable. The rejection of the advance ruling request was upheld on that basis.

---

---

Issues: Whether an application for advance ruling by the recipient of services, seeking a ruling on the taxability of inward supply, was maintainable under the advance ruling provisions.

Analysis: The Authority examined the statutory scheme governing advance rulings and held that an application lies in relation to supply of goods or services undertaken or proposed to be undertaken by the applicant. On the facts, the service in question was to be supplied by a third party to the appellant, making the appellant the recipient of the supply. The Authority further noted that a ruling under the statute binds only the applicant, and a ruling on the taxability of another person's outward supply would not bind that supplier. The transaction therefore fell outside the intended scope of the advance ruling mechanism and the application was not maintainable.

Conclusion: The appeal was not maintainable and the rejection of the advance ruling application was upheld.

Final Conclusion: The statutory advance ruling mechanism was confined to questions arising from supplies undertaken or proposed to be undertaken by the applicant, and a recipient could not seek a binding ruling on the supplier's tax liability for the inward supply.

Ratio Decidendi: An advance ruling application is maintainable only in relation to supplies undertaken or proposed to be undertaken by the applicant, and a recipient cannot obtain a binding ruling on the taxability of another person's supply.

---