Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2022 (3) TMI 1004 - AT - Customs

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal affirms penalties for fraudulent imports, rejects identity theft claim The Tribunal upheld penalties imposed under Section 112 (a) & 114A of the Customs Act, 1962, on Shri Sanjay Arora and Shri Nawal Kishore Singh for ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal affirms penalties for fraudulent imports, rejects identity theft claim

                            The Tribunal upheld penalties imposed under Section 112 (a) & 114A of the Customs Act, 1962, on Shri Sanjay Arora and Shri Nawal Kishore Singh for their involvement in fraudulent imports, rejecting claims of identity theft. The order confirmed their active participation in the scheme, dismissing appeals and affirming their penalties. The Tribunal did not address CONCOR's involvement due to a separate pending appeal.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Misdeclaration and undervaluation of imported goods.
                            2. Involvement of various individuals in the fraudulent import.
                            3. Imposition of penalties under Section 112 (a) & 114A of the Customs Act, 1962.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            Misdeclaration and Undervaluation of Imported Goods:
                            The consignment declared as unbranded glassware was found to contain branded glassware, liquor, cigarettes, and other miscellaneous goods upon examination. The total value of the seized goods was Rs. 3,24,93,450/-. The misdeclaration was intended to evade customs duty.

                            Involvement of Various Individuals:
                            The Department's investigation identified several individuals involved in the fraudulent import, including the proprietor of M/s. Pico Trading Co., Shri Sanjay Arora, and Shri Deepak Kumar Rishi, among others. The investigation revealed that Shri Sanjay Arora had applied for an IEC Code with the help of Shri Deepak Kumar Rishi, who allegedly misused the documents provided by Shri Arora to import misdeclared goods.

                            Role of Shri Sanjay Arora:
                            The Show Cause Notice (SCN) and subsequent investigation highlighted that Shri Sanjay Arora was in regular communication with Shri Deepak Rishi during the relevant period. The call records indicated multiple calls between them around the time of the import. Despite Shri Arora's claim of being a victim of identity theft, the Tribunal found sufficient evidence of his association with Shri Deepak Rishi and concluded that Shri Arora allowed his documents to be used for the fraudulent imports.

                            Role of Shri Nawal Kishore Singh:
                            Shri Nawal Kishore Singh, an employee of Shri Bhupinder Singh, was implicated through call records and statements. The investigation revealed that Shri Singh was involved in facilitating the fraudulent import by providing necessary documents and coordinating with Shri Deepak Rishi. The Tribunal upheld the findings against Shri Singh, citing sufficient evidence of his active participation in the conspiracy.

                            Imposition of Penalties:
                            The Original Adjudicating Authority imposed penalties under Section 112 (a) & 114A of the Customs Act, 1962, on the involved parties. Shri Sanjay Arora was penalized Rs. 10,00,000/- under Section 112 (a) and (q). The Tribunal upheld the imposition of penalties, rejecting the defense of identity theft and acknowledging the active involvement of Shri Arora and Shri Singh in the fraudulent import.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal upheld the order of the Original Adjudicating Authority, confirming the penalties imposed on Shri Sanjay Arora and Shri Nawal Kishore Singh. The appeals were dismissed, and the findings of the involvement of the appellants in the fraudulent import were affirmed. The Tribunal refrained from making any findings concerning CONCOR, as a separate appeal was pending.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found