Excise Appeals Update: Document Verification, Penalty Set Aside, Department's Appeal Dismissed

The Tribunal remanded Excise Appeal No.78517/2018 for document verification regarding the demand of Cenvat credit and Service Tax. The penalty of Rs. 2,00,00,000/- imposed on the Director was set aside in Excise Appeal No.78518/2018. The Department's appeal against the dropping of demand was dismissed in Excise Appeal No.78838/2018.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Demand of Cenvat credit of Rs. 2,36,08,399/- and Service Tax of Rs. 7,663/-.
2. Imposition of penalty of Rs. 2,00,00,000/- on the Director.
3. Department's appeal against dropping of demand of Rs. 33,41,12,047/-.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Demand of Cenvat Credit and Service Tax:
The Appellant company was engaged in manufacturing and availed Cenvat credit of Rs. 35,77,20,446/- for the period 2011-12 to 2013-14. The Department issued a Show Cause Notice on March 22, 2016, proposing recovery of the entire Cenvat credit and Service Tax of Rs. 7,663/- due to non-compliance with Rule 9 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Appellant contended that they had all the required documents and the demand was vague. The Ld. Commissioner confirmed a reduced demand of Rs. 2,36,16,062/- based on a verification report by the Range Superintendent.

2. Imposition of Penalty on the Director:
A penalty of Rs. 2,00,00,000/- was imposed on the Director under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Appellant argued that none of the ingredients of Rule 26 were applicable, and the penalty was unjustified as the case only related to non-production of documents.

3. Department's Appeal Against Dropping of Demand:
The Department appealed against the dropping of Rs. 33,41,12,047/- of the total demand, arguing that the Ld. Adjudicating authority relied on the Range Superintendent’s report without verifying the original documents. The Appellant countered that the verification report was thorough and the demand was based on assumptions.

Judgment:

Issue 1: Demand of Cenvat Credit and Service Tax
The Tribunal noted that the Appellant had produced the entire input Cenvat Credit Register certified by a Chartered Accountant and sample invoices. It was observed that the Appellant had received the goods/services and the dispute was only about document production. The Tribunal remanded the matter to the Ld. Adjudicating authority for verification of the documents related to the confirmed demand of Rs. 2,36,08,399/-. The demand of Service Tax on legal charges was set aside as the charges were debited by the bank and not paid to any Advocate.

Issue 2: Imposition of Penalty on the Director
The Tribunal found the imposition of penalty under Rule 26 on the Director unjustified as the case involved non-production of documents and not fraudulent availment of Cenvat credit. The penalty was set aside with consequential relief as per law.

Issue 3: Department's Appeal Against Dropping of Demand
The Tribunal dismissed the Department's appeal, stating that the Ld. Commissioner had rightly relied on the Range Superintendent’s verification report. The Department's assumption that the Appellant might not have the documents was unfounded. The verification report was detailed, examining over 17,000 pages of documents.

Conclusion:
- Excise Appeal No.78517/2018: Remanded for document verification.
- Excise Appeal No.78518/2018: Allowed with consequential relief.
- Excise Appeal No.78838/2018: Dismissed.

(Order pronounced in the open court on 15 March 2022.)

---