Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order passed under Section 25(1) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 was liable to be set aside for violation of natural justice on the ground that no effective opportunity of personal hearing was granted after the objections were filed.
Analysis: The assessment proceedings were initiated on the basis of penalty imposed under Section 47(6) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003. Although notice was issued and written objections were filed, the objections were taken up and rejected without affording the petitioner the requested personal hearing. The requirement under Section 25(1) is not confined to calling for objections alone; where the assessing authority is not satisfied with the explanation, a reasonable opportunity of being heard must follow before completing the assessment. Since that opportunity was not granted, the assessment suffered from breach of natural justice.
Conclusion: The assessment order was set aside and the matter was directed to be reconsidered after granting an opportunity of hearing.
Ratio Decidendi: Under Section 25(1) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003, when the assessing authority does not accept the dealer's written objections, it must afford a reasonable opportunity of personal hearing before finalising the assessment.