Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revisionary order under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was sustainable where compensation received for compulsory acquisition of land under the RFCTLARR Act, 2013 was claimed to be exempt from income-tax and not chargeable as capital gains.
Analysis: The compensation amount arose from compulsory acquisition of land under the RFCTLARR Act, 2013. The Court noted that CBDT Circular No. 36/2015 dated 25.10.2016 clarifies that income-tax is not leviable on awards or agreements made under the RFCTLARR Act, except those covered by section 46. The Court also considered section 96 of the RFCTLARR Act, 2013, which provides that no income-tax or stamp duty shall be levied on any award or agreement made under the Act except under section 46. On the facts, the acquisition was not shown to fall within the exception under section 46, and therefore the compensation was not liable to capital gains tax.
Conclusion: The revision under section 263 was not justified and was liable to be set aside.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded, and the assessment revision directed by the Principal Commissioner did not survive.
Ratio Decidendi: Compensation received under the RFCTLARR Act, 2013 for land acquisition is exempt from income-tax except where the statutory exception applies, and a section 263 revision cannot stand when the assessed amount is not chargeable to tax.