Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether trade discount was excludible from the assessable value for excise duty purposes, and whether a refund claim based on excess duty collected on that account was barred by limitation under Rule 11.
Analysis: The Explanation to Section 4 required trade discount to be excluded while determining assessable value. Duty paid on a valuation that wrongly included trade discount was therefore paid under a mistake of law. Since the excess duty had been collected without authority of law, the limitation under Rule 11 did not govern the refund claim.
Conclusion: The refund claim was maintainable and not barred by Rule 11; the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Excess excise duty collected on a valuation that wrongly includes trade discount is paid under a mistake of law and without authority of law, so the refund claim is not defeated by the limitation under Rule 11.