Regular bail in GST input tax credit fraud case granted after considering investigation stage, trial gravity, and statutory framework.

Regular bail was granted in a GST prosecution alleging issuance of fake invoices, operation of paper firms, and wrongful availment and passing on of input tax credit. The Court noted that the investigation had substantially progressed, the complaint had been filed, and statements had been recorded, while the offences were triable by the Magistrate and carried a maximum sentence of five years. It also considered the statutory recovery and compounding framework, along with the stage of the proceedings and the likely time for trial, before balancing these factors against the allegation that the applicant was the operator of the firms and the mastermind of the alleged fraud.

---

---

Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to regular bail in a prosecution alleging fraudulent availment and passing on of input tax credit under the GST enactments.

Analysis: The applicant was in custody after arrest in a case alleging issuance of fake invoices, operation of paper firms, and wrongful availment and utilisation of input tax credit. The material before the Court indicated that the investigation had substantially progressed, the complaint had been filed, statements had been recorded, and the prosecution case was that the applicant was the operator of the firms and the mastermind of the alleged fraud. At the same time, the offences were triable by the Magistrate and carried a maximum sentence of five years, while the statute also provided for recovery and compounding mechanisms. The Court balanced the nature of the allegation, the stage of the proceedings, and the likely time for trial against the considerations relevant to bail.

Conclusion: Regular bail was granted to the applicant.

---