Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against the corporate debtor was barred by limitation.
Analysis: The limitation for a Section 7 application is governed by Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 and, after a decree or recovery certificate, a fresh period of limitation may run from that date. The application here was filed after the decree of 06.05.2011 and the recovery certificates of 22.12.2011, and the subsequent dismissal of the corporate debtor's appeal on 14.02.2017 did not create a new period of limitation. The plea based on one-time settlement offers and alleged acknowledgment was not sufficient to extend limitation on the facts found, and the adjudicating authority had failed to deal with the limitation objection before admitting the application.
Conclusion: The application under Section 7 was held to be time-barred and could not have been admitted.
Final Conclusion: The admission order was set aside and the insolvency application was dismissed as barred by time.
Ratio Decidendi: A Section 7 application must be filed within the limitation period prescribed by Article 137, and a subsequent appeal against an already crystallised decree does not, by itself, extend or revive limitation for initiating insolvency proceedings.