Tribunal Upholds Comparable Selection Based on Functional Comparability Over Turnover Differences

The Tribunal upheld the inclusion of M/s. CG VAK Software & Exports Ltd. as a comparable for benchmarking international transactions, rejecting the Revenue's argument based on persistent losses. It emphasized that functional comparability outweighs turnover differences unless they significantly impact the function, asset, and risk analysis. The decision dismissed the Revenue's appeal and the assessee's cross-objection, emphasizing the significance of functional comparability in transfer pricing analysis and clarifying that turnover variances alone do not justify exclusion in the presence of functional similarities.

---

---

Issues involved:
1. Inclusion of M/s. CG VAK Software and Exports Ltd. as a comparable for benchmarking international transactions.
2. Exclusion of M/s. CG VAK Software & Exports Ltd. based on turnover comparison.

Issue 1: Inclusion of M/s. CG VAK Software and Exports Ltd. as a comparable for benchmarking international transactions:
The Revenue challenged the inclusion of M/s. CG VAK Software and Exports Ltd. as a comparable for benchmarking international transactions. The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) proposed adjustments based on comparables excluding CG VAK Software & Exports Ltd. due to being a persistent loss-making company. However, the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) directed the inclusion of CG VAK Software & Exports Ltd. as a comparable, leading to the deletion of proposed adjustments. The Revenue argued for exclusion based on persistent losses, while the assessee contended that CG VAK Software & Exports Ltd. had been profitable in certain years. The Tribunal analyzed the financial reports of CG VAK Software & Exports Ltd. for past years and found profitability in the BPO segment for two out of three consecutive years, thereby rejecting the Revenue's appeal and upholding the DRP's direction for inclusion.

Issue 2: Exclusion of M/s. CG VAK Software & Exports Ltd. based on turnover comparison:
The Revenue sought exclusion of CG VAK Software & Exports Ltd. based on turnover disparity compared to the assessee. The Tribunal noted that functional comparability was not in question, and the Revenue's argument focused on quantitative differences. Emphasizing that transfer pricing analysis primarily considers net margins rather than turnover, the Tribunal held that mere turnover differences do not warrant exclusion unless significant functional dissimilarities exist. Citing a precedent, the Tribunal ruled that functional comparability prevails over turnover differences unless it affects the function, asset, and risk analysis significantly. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's additional grounds seeking exclusion based on turnover comparison.

In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and the cross-objection by the assessee as they became infructuous. The decision emphasized the importance of functional comparability in transfer pricing analysis and highlighted that turnover differences alone do not justify exclusion if functional similarities exist.

---