Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal was justified in allowing input tax credit on purchases after verifying that the selling dealers were registered and the transactions were supported by banking records.
Analysis: The Assessing Authority had denied input tax credit on the basis of information received from the Special Investigation Officer and treated the purchases as having been made from unregistered dealers. The Tribunal, acting as the final court of fact, reappreciated the material, verified the dealers on the official departmental website, and recorded a factual finding that the sellers were duly registered during the relevant period and that payments were made through bank. The record and the finding of the Tribunal were not shown to be disputed on material particulars, and no question of law arose from the factual determination.
Conclusion: The Tribunal was justified in granting input tax credit, and the revisions failed.
Final Conclusion: The common revisional challenge to the Tribunal's factual finding was rejected, and the orders allowing the dealer's claim were left undisturbed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the final fact-finding authority records a verified factual finding that purchases were from registered dealers and payments were made through bank, no question of law arises for interference in revision on the denial of input tax credit.